home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Minutes from the Operational Statistics Working Group meetings at
- the San Diego IETF, March 16-20, 1992.
-
- Participants:
-
- Chris Myers chris@wugate.wustl.edu
- Nevil Brownbe nevil@aukuni.ac.az
- Brian Shiflett bshiflet@icm1.icp.net
- Jim Alfieri jdal@troy.cc.bellcore.com
- Ken Goodwin goodwin@psc.edu
- Stefan Fassbender stf@easi.net
- David Waitman djw@bbn.com
- Robert J Reschly Jr reschly@brl.com
- Ron Roberts roberts@jessica.stanford.edu
- Henry Clark henryc@oar.net
- Frances Yeh fyeh@rafael.jpl.nasa.gov
- Al Wiersma wiersma@nsipo.nasa.gov
- Ursula Sinkewicz sinkewic@decvax.dec.com
- Miriam Nihart miriam@ltning.zso.dec.com
- Dale S Johnsson dsj@merit.edu
- Vikas Aggarwal vikas@jvnc.net
- Pushpendre Mohte pushp@cerf.net
- Bill Bliss billbl@microsoft.com
- Tom Easterday tom@cic.net
- Frank Solensky solensky@clearpoint.com
- Linda Liebengood ldl@ans.net
- Kary Robertson kr@concord.com
- Hock-Koon Lim lim@po.cwru.edu
- Bill Mannings bmanning@rice.edu
-
-
- First session, Tuesday March 17.
-
- 1. Review of the OPSTAT document.
-
- The document on "A Internet Model for Operational Statistics" was
- reviewed. Decisions:
-
- - In listings of MIB variables suggested for gathering the name
- shall be the last part of the fully qualified MIB name as long as
- this uniquely defines the variable.
-
- - A suggestion of adding InErrors and OutErrors was not approved as
- these variables are counted differently in different MIB
- implementations.
-
- - Valid types for bandwidths and protocol types should be explicitly
- enumerated.
-
- - The timezone part of the timestamp in the datasection is redundant
- and is moved to the devicesection.
-
- - It shall be more clearly stated that document gives
- recommendations and polling and saving periods are not mandatory.
-
- After these changes have been included the meeting decided that the
- document shall be submitted as Internet Draft. Changes suggested
- that would make major changes necessary can be discussed and decided
- on during the six month Internet Draft reviewing period.
-
- 2. SQL Database
-
- The meeting discussed possible use of SQL database technique As SQL
- is optimized for other purposes than retrieval of serialized data
- the meeting concluded that SQL was not appropriate to use in
- retrieval of statistical data.
-
- 3. Implementations of the OPSTAT model
-
- The meeting made a review of NOC's prepared to implement the
- operational statistical model when the Internet Draft is submitted.
- Below NOC's who were represented at this meeting expressed interest:
-
- Merit (Dale Johnsson)
- New Zeeland (Nevil Brownbe)
- RIPE NCC (Daniel Karrenberg)
- EUnet (Daniel Karrenberg on behalf of Joy Marino)
-
- 4. Need of theoretical framework
-
- The meeting discussed the need for a theoretical statistical
- framework as current thinking to some extent is based in practical
- experiences. Kim Cluffy, SDSC, is writing a PhD thesis on analysis
- of wide area network. The output may have a lot in common with the
- OPSTAT work. Bellcore has developed models for statistical analysis
- of data from packet switch networks which also could show beneficial
- for the OPSTAT work. Contact shall be taken with Bellcore to
- investigate if their models also could fit in the Internet
- architecture.
-
-
- Session 2, Wednesday March 18.
-
- 5. Review of future activities.
-
- At an early stage the OPSTAT group discussed possibilities of using
- a client/server based system for retrieval of statistical data. The
- meeting agreed that such model would be useful to offload network
- equipment from SNMP processing and to enforce access control of
- statistical data.
-
- Some similar system may already exist. As examples were mentioned a
- system developed by DEC.
-
- 6. Review of existing tools.
-
- NASA have tools that currently is configured for 1 minute polling.
- The 1 minute polls are stored internally in the program and 15
- minutes average and peaks are being stored onto secondary storage.
- The NASA statistical tools may be made publically available.
-
- Milo Medin, NASA, expressed the need of differentiating between
- statistical tools and monitoring tools. SNMP access is not the same
- as access to statistical data. A client/server based system may show
- useful in accessing logged data when there is no "public" snmp
- access. Another method would be to give access to the tables and
- diagrams produced from statistical data.
-
- OARnet have tools that currently does weekly loggings of the data.
- The tools are more oriented towards logging of error conditions.
-
- RIPE NCC has tools developed from the ISODE snmp code using gawk
- with snmp capabilities. These tools are already adopted to the
- OPSTAT thinking and changes to reflect the lastest storage formats
- may easily be included. Daniel Karrenberg gave a short presentation
- of these tools.
-
- RICE University are using enhanced Merit tools. The tools are
- written for AIX and SUN Sparc and could be made publically
- available.
-
-